I’m def not a trickle-down economics guy. I believe in redistribution (but what amount?).
The point I make on taxes is quite novel however, since the research just got published. I’d look into it if you disagree with it.
Among other things, it’s useful because the post-war is quite a unique period, and drawing any conclusions from one data point is risky.
The internet was unregulated because it was deemed as safe, not because of a cry for freedom. As you can see, the moment there’s a potential threat identified, people claim for regulation.
Thank you for the recommendation. I have looked into the paper. It was all right. I don't agree with all of it. In fact, I don't agree with most of it. But it makes some valid points.
I’m def not a trickle-down economics guy. I believe in redistribution (but what amount?).
The point I make on taxes is quite novel however, since the research just got published. I’d look into it if you disagree with it.
Among other things, it’s useful because the post-war is quite a unique period, and drawing any conclusions from one data point is risky.
The internet was unregulated because it was deemed as safe, not because of a cry for freedom. As you can see, the moment there’s a potential threat identified, people claim for regulation.
Thank you for the recommendation. I have looked into the paper. It was all right. I don't agree with all of it. In fact, I don't agree with most of it. But it makes some valid points.
I always appreciate your warm and thoughtful comments.
I'll look into the research.