3 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

True! Not only for the writing part and for the internal cohesion, but also idea-wise. I once disagreed with my co-author in our article on inclusive design in hospitality management. Language wise and content wise. We published without resolving our issue.

So one could think of multiple iterations wiki-style if the goal is to publish a perfect article. But you could also think of good-enough versions and engaging the readers to help improve the underlying idea / solutions suggested.

Curious on your experiences in the nuclear energy article.

Expand full comment

BTW is there a deadline for your survey?

I am taking a detour in survey response by linking it to my value discovery project and re-exploring my dreams with the help of AI.

One of my dreams, like you and others here, I’ve started to explore ideas of co-creative writing that’s of value to the reader. I am thinking along the lines of constructivism, fan fiction and human centered design.

Based on my co-authoring experiences, I guess the purpose of the article needs to be quite clear like helping people learn or solving a specific problem.

Expand full comment

Would be good to be done about now!

Expand full comment