This is not what I said.
The question is the long-term effects of vaccines vs. long-term effects of the virus. The latter are much more probable.
I don't agree with this last point you make. That's like cutting a forest so that it doesn't burn. The point of the vaccine is so that you don't get an infection, and if you do, you're much more…
The question is the long-term effects of vaccines vs. long-term effects of the virus. The latter are much more probable.
I don't agree with this last point you make. That's like cutting a forest so that it doesn't burn. The point of the vaccine is so that you don't get an infection, and if you do, you're much more protected and the infection is mild. Suffering the infection to be protected for future infections defeats the purpose.
This is not what I said.
The question is the long-term effects of vaccines vs. long-term effects of the virus. The latter are much more probable.
I don't agree with this last point you make. That's like cutting a forest so that it doesn't burn. The point of the vaccine is so that you don't get an infection, and if you do, you're much more protected and the infection is mild. Suffering the infection to be protected for future infections defeats the purpose.
Well the problem is Omnicron: kids will get infected, vaccinated or not!