Discussion about this post

User's avatar
EB's avatar

You asked why newly hatched birds are helpless (referred to as altricial) as opposed to other birds like mallards whose young are able to fend for themselves soon after hatching (precocial). Mother bird has to invest a lot of protein in an egg to support enough development of the fetuses so that they can walk and feed on their own soon after birth. In seed, fruit, and nectar eating birds it may be difficult for mother to find enough protein to invest in the egg for that much development. Precocial young in birds, mammals, and other groups have the advantage of being able to flee predators soon after hatching, whereas altricial young are helpless and depend on hiding to avoid predation. This is probably why ground nesting species like ducks and ostriches have precocial young... they need to be mobile to try to escape ground predators. Ungulates also have precocial young, probably for the same reason of escaping predators. Think antelopes on the Serengetti plain in Africa, with big cats, hyenas, and hunting dogs all looking for a meal. Primates are unusual among mammals in having helpless young and perhaps this is due to a physicial limit on how big a head can fit through the mother's birth canal.

Expand full comment
EB's avatar

Another interesting contribution to this series. Once again weighing in as a biologist, I think the 2D vs 3D perspective is an over simplification. There are many exceptions. Birds with flight have a 3D life history, but one finds a wide range of mating systems from life-time monogamy to extreme polygyny. A more important factor is the distribution of resources essential to breeding and a male's ability to defend resources. When resources like good nest sites or food are unevenly distributed, then a dominant male may be able to defend high quality territories and attract multiple females to mate polygynously, as in red-winged blackbirds. When nesting and feeding resources are more uniformly distributed, as in tropical rainforests, then monogamy is the more likely mating system since male contributions to rearing chicks is more important. Even in monogamous species, however, both sexes can increase the genetic diversity of their offspring through sneaky extra pair copulation. And then there are lek mating systems, where males gather in communal display areas to signal, and females visit only to obtain sperm from one male and then leave to rear offspring entirely on their own. Leks can be 2D, as in frogs and grouse, or 3D as in birds of paradise and some bats. Hard to come up with dimensional contributions to leks. Add in scramble competition mating systems when large numbers of males and females congregate for a single seasonal mating event, as in gnats and wood frogs - no rules here, it's every frog or gnat for itself. The more I've learned about mating in the myriad of different animal groups over my career, the less confident I am in coming up with "rules" to teach students.

Expand full comment
17 more comments...

No posts