Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Miguel García Álvarez's avatar

Just a point that should be important to mention. Things started to go wrong in Venezuela in 1983, when the full economy collapsed during the Venezuelan Black Friday. After that came all the austerity measures and the collapse of the banking system in the 90s. When Chávez took over, in 1998, Venezuela was already in a pretty bad situation; then the Chavismo made it even worse (which seemed impossible at the time).

PS: You do mention it in the article, but I think it might be relevant from the start (and then clarify later).

Mike's avatar

A single export country with a history of authoritarianism and coups fails to diversify, allows rampant top-level political and economic corruption, fails to initiate timely public-sector investment and stimulus, elects and maintains back-to-back dictatorships, fails to reign in rampant inflation, and is economically crashed by import sanctions from the world's most powerful nation...

...and they thought it would work?

You can't make socialism-capitalism cake* work in that situation. The government will always become increasingly desperate to ensure it maintains control, and strongman authoritarianism always results.

* Socialism-capitalism cake: Supporting your people with a basic welfare system to keep people from falling through and becoming resentful, and encouraging a top layer of diverse, mostly-free-market capitalism, kept reasonably fair through regulations, to encourage productivity and innovation.

Too much government involvement and you get soul-crushing authoritarianism and a stangant, inflexible society, regardless of political alignment. Too little government involvement and you get another Gilded Age with robber barons, zero-sum-game wealth and poverty, and society-destroying monopolies.

93 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?